:: Volume 10, Issue 35 (spring 2017) ::
پژوهشنامه اخلاق 2017, 10(35): 103-122 Back to browse issues page
Moral Norms Inferred from Razavi Debates
Mohammad Ghaffari , Mohammadreza Baghbanzadah
Abstract:   (4919 Views)
Public debates are regarded as special objective case in human communicative deed. This particular deed needs a moral model to avoid damages in the way. Imam Reza`s debates, as a perfect man, have been of leading aspects and, therefore, led to profits for debater. Regarding difference of view or negative view of criticizing people about validity or invalidity of debate, this paper has viewed         moral-based debate as the most useful one to the two parties. As is inferred from Rzavi`s debates eight norms may be used for a debate to be useful for the two parties including right-seeking, justice, respect, tolerance, trustworthiness, rightfulness, impartiality and good intention. The norms have been explaind in the paper.
Keywords: Islamic Morality, Communicative Deed, Moral Norms, Razavi Debates.
Full-Text [PDF 303 kb]   (925 Downloads)    
Type of Study: theoretic | Subject: Applied ethics
Received: 2017/06/24 | Accepted: 2017/06/24 | Published: 2017/06/24


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 35 (spring 2017) Back to browse issues page