|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 3 results for Shaker Zaardehi
Roohollah Shaker Zaardehi, Zeinab Kiani,
Volume 5, Issue 16 (summer 2012)
Abstract
Egoism is considered as one of the common ethical trends. On egoism, one should act in such a manner that provides the most charities and utilties. Egoism appears in two fields of ethics and psychology. These two types of egoism differ in some aspects and resemble in some others. In this paper, two fields of egoism have been studied with a critic-analytical approach. Further, the proof by love to the self as one proving egoism has been surveyed with regard to Islamic philosophy.
Roohollah Shaker Zaardehi, Mohammadsadegh Ardalan,
Volume 15, Issue 57 (autumn 2022)
Abstract
There has been a long-lasting problem in ethics: how can one think of justice and goodness as consistent? Imam Ali also explores the connection between them. Whereas he defined justice as “putting things in their places” or “giving everyone his own right”, he referred to the common good as “what is achieved by justice” to show that the common good depends on justice. On the other hand, there are a variety of moral obstacles in the path of promoting social justice. Using a descriptive-analytic method, this study seeks to explore ways of connecting justice and the common good from Imam Ali's moral standpoint. As a result of the research, it was found that the Islamic lifestyle and ethics are constituted by justice, and that social life is impossible without it. Moreover, when conflict arises between them, justice overrides goodness.
Mohamadjavad Hasanzadehmashkani, Roohollah Shaker Zaardehi,
Volume 17, Issue 63 (spring 2024)
Abstract
Modern theology as liberal theology is against classical theology. In this school, the teachings of classical theology have been challenged. One of the practical topics of modern theology in the problem of evil is the explanation of good and evil in terms of pleasure and pain and its relationship with the denial of classical theology, including Islamic monotheism. Dr. John Haspers, the head of the Department of Philosophy at the University of Southern California, by explaining the definition of good and evil in the two areas of "super-ethical" and "normative ethics", has sought to define good and evil and claims to deny the divine God.
The main problem of this research is to explain, examine and criticize the thought of John Hospers in the field of definition of good and evil.
The research method is data collection, library studies, critical analysis of the materials based on the sources found in the works of John Hospers.
According to the findings of the research, Hosperus proves that good is pleasure and evil has a parallel relationship with suffering, which is rejected in three categories: "the originality of pleasure", "belonging to pleasure and pain" and "identification of evil and pain".
|
|
