Hare agrees with religious claims not to be provable, falsifiable, and cognitive. However, for him, religious statements are bliks or mental nonfalsifiable suppositions that prepare certain deep comment of the world and a certain vision for man with such a extended realm which include all requisite affairs in human life. And this is the reason why for their being useful. Furthermore, Hare, in his metaethic view, has sought to attain a manner of reasonability in ethics upon which can be built objectivity of ethical principles. Hare has known trueness and falsifiability and generalization as requisites for ethical objectivity and has thought opinions preparing such requisites. Yet it seems that the teaching of bilik would lead to mentality and relativism as two damages of reasonable ethics. The failure has made Hare`s school of ethics as one self-contradicted.