[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 17, Issue 65 (Autumn 2024) ::
پژوهشنامه اخلاق 2024, 17(65): 5-5 Back to browse issues page
Explanation of the distinction Between habit and state according to Mulla Sadra in the Light of Comparison with Masha's Wisdom
Ahad Faramarzgharamaleky , Zeinab Barkhordari , Soodeh Jafari
University of Tehran
Abstract:   (144 Views)
In Masha's philosophy, the concept of the state  is considered as a firm and consistent state in the soul, and the queens of the soul are considered as a state in which behavior can be issued from them with ease; In this way,the concept of the state  is used in ethics, and the foundation of virtuous ethics is laid by Muslim philosophers. In Masha'i discourse, the state  is a state resulting from the repetition of the verb that this expression does not show the border of the habit and the state ,and in other words reduces the state  to a habit. The purpose of this research is to show this distinction based on Mulla Sadra's point of view. In this regard, due to the influence of Muslim pilgrims from Aristotle and also the influence of Mulla Sadra from the Muslim pilgrim philosophers, it is necessary to address Aristotle's point of view. The method used in this research is an analytical approach in terms of logical tools. To achieve this goal, the concept of habit and state  in the discourse of Masha'i and philosophers before Mulla Sadra is evaluated and analyzed in order to determine the innovation of Mulla Sadra's idea in explaining the relationship between habit and state.
From Aristotle to Mulla Sadra,there is no distinction between state  and custom; Mulla Sadra is the first Muslim philosopher who seriously opposes the reduction of the state  to habit and believes that the appearance of doing an action based on habit and state is the same, but there are two actions with two different measurement principles; Mulla Sadra defines the state  apart from habit and with other components. One of the distinguishing boundaries between habit and state according to Mulla Sadra is the condition of considering habit to be dependent on the self, while the state ,if they are established, will be the essence of the self,which is not possible to achieve such an idea in the Masha'i system of thought. In the present research, we will analyze and investigate the innovation of Mulla Sadra's point of view about habit and state in comparison with Masha's discourse.
 
Keywords: Habit, state, Selfish board, substance, action
     
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: Normative ethics
Received: 2024/11/13 | Accepted: 2024/10/1 | Published: 2024/10/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Faramarzgharamaleky A, Barkhordari Z, Jafari S. Explanation of the distinction Between habit and state according to Mulla Sadra in the Light of Comparison with Masha's Wisdom. پژوهشنامه اخلاق 2024; 17 (65) :5-5
URL: http://akhlagh.maaref.ac.ir/article-1-2500-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 17, Issue 65 (Autumn 2024) Back to browse issues page
فصلنامه علمی پژوهشنامه اخلاق Research Quarterly in Islamic Ethics
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.07 seconds with 36 queries by YEKTAWEB 4680