|
Analytical Study of the Distinction between Habit and acquisition from Mulla Sadra's Perspective In Light of Comparison with peripatetic Philosophy ض
|
Ahad Faramarzgharamaleky    , Zeinab Barkhordari , Soodeh Jafari |
| PhD in Islamic Philosophy and Theology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. jafari_so@ut.ac.ir |
|
|
Abstract: (578 Views) |
In peripatetic 's philosophy, physical qualities are considered as states from which behavior can be easily produced; In this way, the concept of acquisition finds application in ethics and the foundation of virtue ethics is laid among Muslim philosophers. In peripatetic discourse, acquisition is a state resulting from the repetition of a act, which does not show the boundary between habit and acquisition and reduces acquisition to habit. The findings of the present study are that from Aristotle to Mulla Sadra, there is no distinction between the acquisition and the habit, and Mulla Sadra is the first Muslim philosopher to oppose the reduction of the acquisition to the habit. One of the distinguishing boundaries between the habit and the acquisition is the temporary state of habit on the soul, while the acquisition, if they become established, will become intrinsic to the soul. The aim of the present study is to demonstrate this distinction by relying on Mulla Sadra's innovation in explaining the relationship between habit and acquisition, which is realized with an analytical method and approach in terms of logical requirements. |
|
| Keywords: Habit, acquisition, physical form, substance and innateness, act, Mulla Sadra, peripatetic Philosophy |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 419 kb]
(54 Downloads)
|
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Normative ethics
Received: 2024/11/13 | Accepted: 2024/10/1 | Published: 2024/10/1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
