|
Criticism and Analysis of the disabled Abortion: according to The principle of Not Doing Harm
from an Ethical Perspective
|
Mohaddeseh Molavi   , Ali Reza AleBouyeh |
| Assistant Professor, Department of Islamic Studies, Faculty of Theology and Islamic Studies, Al-Zahra University, Tehran, Iran. |
|
|
Abstract: (568 Views) |
Abortion is one of the important issues of medical ethics that moral philosophers talking about its permissibility or non-permissibility by relying on the principles of reasoning. One of these principles is the principle of not doing harm. Their entire duty is to prevent harming others. based on this principle, argue that the birth of a disabled fetus causes harm to the disabled child and those around him, and thus give moral justification for abortion. On the other hand, some people object to this argument and believe that the main harm is that a living being is aborted and destroyed. In this article, the aforementioned argument will be reviewed and criticized. using a library study method and in a descriptive-analytical manner. Based on the research findings, this argument faces criticism and the argument of non-harm can be used to justify the moral impermissibility of abortion of a disabled fetus. |
|
| Keywords: Applied ethics, principle of non-harm, abortion of a disabled fetus, harm to a disabled child, harm to society, harm to the family. |
|
|
Full-Text [PDF 459 kb]
(56 Downloads)
|
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
Applied ethics
Received: 2024/01/27 | Accepted: 2024/10/1 | Published: 2024/10/1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Send email to the article author |
|
|
|
| Add your comments about this article |
|
|
|
